Reply to post: Re: Theory and Reality

Harmed by a decision made by a poorly trained AI? You should be able to sue for damages, says law prof

PeteA
IT Angle

Re: Theory and Reality

Clearly rhetorical question answered: the person who used the gun. Exactly the same as any other murder weapon.

Framing the AI question similarly: the person who chose to entrust [a particular] AI with a life-critical decision. The AI is just a tool, speaking purely personally I'd like to some _real_ intelligence before we move on to artificial.

Back in the real world, it's usually not so simple - in my experience, you often see organisations forming a "cultural identity" which is essentially a shared-belief-system. This can help promote workforce unity, but can have ugly consequences when a "freak wave event" of shared identity ("tribalism"), social pressure and external pressures are combined with dubiously ethical directives from "The Boss". Haven't personally experienced the phenomenon to this level of importance, but have seen the general sequence of events a couple of times.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon