Re: Why 5G ?
>>any time you find yourself without a signal do you consider it a good trade-off for somebody somewhere else to have 5G?
Depending on where I am when I do not have coverage.
For the UK the answer is YES.
Because in the UK, *no* coverage is somewhere remote/rural/poorly populated.
Or no coverage from any network means it might not be technically feasible.
Do I spend 100% of my use without 5G or 0.1% of my use without any coverage, with prior knowledge I won't get coverage?
Yes, 5G please.
I don't expect anyone to spend million of ££££ to provide coverage in some location for 20 phone calls a year.
It just does not make sense to justify that spend because of personal circumstances.
It might mean getting a sat phone or femtocell etc.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
