Proves little
To be honest if you actually carried out the search yourself and then left your phone in the car and then paid someone to go and torch the vehicle also lending them your car does not put you physically at the scene, it only proves your involvement. I say this screwhead should go to Ye Olde Gaol for a long time but it hardly proves him at the scene only assumes it was him. He could have also been an accomplice who drove “said”, crook to the scene. The phone and truck could be part payment of the intimidation. Leaves a lot of loose ends to me. A decent lawyer would argue only a minor involvement and that he may have lent phone and truck to someone to intimidate the witness and the said crook decided to torch the truck..... Google evidence seems to have only provided an element of doubt.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
