Reply to post: IoT ideas are misspelled? "di" is missin.

Why is IoT locked in 'proof-of-concept hell'? Stakeholders don't talk to each other, and return on investment is hazy

RM Myers
Unhappy

IoT ideas are misspelled? "di" is missin.

Wait, are you saying you would have to be an id-IoT to have an internet connected toilet (1), cock lock (2), "smart" lock (3), nanny cam (4), or similar device? I don't understand, what could possibly go wrong?

(1) https://www.digitaltrends.com/home/best-smart-toilets-ces-2019/

(2) https://lockthecock.com/products/cellmate

(3) https://www.cnet.com/news/have-a-smart-lock-yeah-it-can-probably-be-hacked/

(4) https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/06/05/617196788/s-c-mom-says-baby-monitor-was-hacked-experts-say-many-devices-are-vulnerable

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon