Reply to post: it is about copying of interface definitions

After ten years, the Google vs Oracle API copyright mega-battle finally hit the Supreme Court – and we listened in

sbt
Meh

it is about copying of interface definitions

Yes, which were subject to copyright. But you can write as many MULTI(X, Y) functions as you like; copyright isn't in a single function signature (or even a list). You can add MULTI(X,Y) to every language you create. This case is not about what most developers do, or even library software vendors.

You just can't copy Java's API source code and make it your own (unless you accept the GPL, or promise to be 100% compatible).

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon