Reply to post: Erm, and Microsoft - they don't monopolise?

Big Tech to face its Ma Bell moment? US House Dems demand break-up of 'monopolists' Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Erm, and Microsoft - they don't monopolise?

Last time I checked MS owned linkedin Dynamics, Skype, Teams, their AD requires a CAL which means its not financially viable for most orgs using e.g. G-Suite.

The "Linux is Cancer" crew bought themselves onto the Linux Foundation, all your public and private Github repo's. Basically anything you write Microsoft spell checks. They do not credit the open source community when they plagerize (Grid being one of the latest I know about). They make recommendations based on your email (meaning their AI read your docs before it recommended you read them before attending a meeting). Microsoft is the all-seeing-eye of the United States and rest of world and undermine all companies in their persuit of world domination. So who are these people determining every big company that isn't Microsoft need breaking up? Are they all people that have had a back-hander from the "devil incarnate"? They obviously never had to buy an OEM license back in the day just to own a PC.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon