
Re: Snowflakes
Okay, let me spell this out for you. Let's suppose that you and I are going to do business. As you walk into my storefront, I see you kick a puppy. I decide not to do business with you because I don't like people who kick puppies. According to your argument, I am wrong for making that choice and am, in some bizarre fashion, obligated to do business with you even though I find your behavior loathsome.
Is that really the argument you want to make?
Also: "You don't appear to have thought of the rights of the sellers of such software."
What rights? How are their rights in any way being abrogated? Your arguments are nonsensical, and a reasonable person might ask why I'm bothering to argue with you, to which I can only respond, "Welcome to the Internet."