Reply to post:

£2.5bn sueball claims Google slurps kids' YouTube browsing habits then sells them on

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Generally I would agree as it's all too easy to get foamy at the mouth when it comes to these companies. However pornographic sites don't have content aimed at kids under 13. Add to that paying for content for under 13's and selling advertising space on that content it starts getting a bit iffy. Furthermore why is that content not only on you tube kids if it's for kids. This also depends on how they sold that advertising, do they allow advertisers to specifically target kids under 13? It'll be interesting to see the outcome and how much the law firm get to take from google if they win.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020