Reply to post: Re: facial recognition

Remember OpenAI's GPT model that was too dangerous for mere mortals? Well, it's now for sale on Azure

ST Silver badge
Meh

Re: facial recognition

> Surely when you are "read your rights" that includes the reason for the arrest?

There was an eyewitness, who, it turns out, incorrectly identified him. The eyewitness also provided a video. The video was fed into some crap AI software that erroneously confirmed the eyewitness' mistaken identification.

That's the line the DPD will use to justify their actions. They may have even obtained an arrest warrant based on the eyewitness' testimony plus the facial recognition software confirmation.

Is this OK? No.

Should this facial recognition piece of garbage software be banned from police use? Yes.

Should the manufacturer of the facial recognition software be held liable for violating this person's civil rights? Yes.

Should the manufacturer of the facial recognition software be held liable for misrepresenting the capabilities of their software to a law enforcement agency? Yes.

Should there be a national standard for the use of facial recognition software by police? Definitely Yes.

Will any of this happen? Doubtful.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021