Re: DHS head has no authority
If the orders themselves are unlawful, then it makes no difference who issues them - any federal employee would be obligated to refuse them anyway.
If they're not unlawful, then who needs "cover"?
If the orders themselves are unlawful, then it makes no difference who issues them - any federal employee would be obligated to refuse them anyway.
If they're not unlawful, then who needs "cover"?