Reply to post: 5G is not 5G is not 5G

MediaTek pings Italy with '5G' Internet-of-Things data beam from geostationary satellite 35,000 kilometres up

Flak

5G is not 5G is not 5G

Interesting article and experiment.

So, for those who think 5G means low latency, high bandwidth and mobility:

Geostationary 5G is not going to deliver low latency (speed of light constraint given the distance to the satellite).

High bandwidth - perhaps, but not using NB-IoT - the clue is in the NB (narrow bandwidth).

Had a quick look and cannot see any photos of the 'standard NB-IoT device' which has been connected. The cynic in me thinks that while the NB-IoT chip may be standard, there will need to be a parabolic dish of reasonable size to send/receive the signal. Mobility - limited.

Finally, I also have a sneaking suspicion that the power consumption of the overall device will be far greater than what would be practical for a mobile device.

To be clear, I think this is a great achievement and will further standards development and may lead to sensible services over time (but not tomorrow)...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon