Reply to post: Re: Perfect Mail Client

'One rule for me, another for them' is all well and good until it sinks the entire company's ability to receive emails

gryphon

Re: Perfect Mail Client

Actually if memory serves Exchange 2003, and 2007 to an extent, did do single instancing of messages / attachments.

They took it away in 2010 when storage became 'cheap' although I think even then 2010 did attachment compression.

Obviously the user would still be 'charged' for the logical space taken up by the storage limits but, especially with sales teams or accountants who insisted on e-mailing massive spreadsheets to each other, the size of the database could be way less than the sum of the individual mailboxes so to speak.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon