Reply to post: C++ and backwards compatibility

In Rust, we lust: Security-focused super-C++ language still most loved among Stack Overflow denizens

bombastic bob Silver badge
Devil

C++ and backwards compatibility

with the exception of 'auto' and some other minor 'nits', C++ code using the old style from the early days SHOULD still compile and run as expected, even with the newest/shiniest C++ standard supported by the compiler.

(At least I haven't run into anything, though a few sloppy constructs "you used to get away with" might cause a bit of grief and require some fixin' with things like explicit casts and proper rvalue/lvalue handling).

Can't say the same thing about Python 2 to 3, now can we??

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon