No, you're completely over the line into tax evasion. Most of them involve lying about the purpose of the expense, and that equates to fraud.
Nope, none of them involve lying about the purpose of the expense, only making sure that when an expense is incurred it provides maximum enjoyment in addition to the business purpose.
If you're going to pretend that no contract does any of the things I've suggested in this thread, when in 25 years every single contractor I've met has done at least one of them at the time I knew them, most of them have been engaged in several of the tax reductions at the same time, then continuing the debate is pointless because you've successfully deceived yourself, but only yourself you understand.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
