"The frequency that they're using is just below the classification of a weapon"
Statements like that make me immediately think : citation, please ? What is the scientific founding of your statement ?
It's not because you can articulate correctly that I am automatically going to bow before your words. You still need to make sense, and your arguments still need to be justified.
It's like that stupid video about 9/11, showing one tower collapsing. The voice was saying that it was obvious that the debris was falling at the same speed as the tower, when the video was clearly showing that it fell faster.
If you're too stupid to realize that your eyes are telling you a different story than your ears, then you don't deserve to be part of the human race.
Sorry, but stupidity really gets me rankled.