Reply to post: "The frequency that they're using is just below the classification of a weapon"

From attacked engineers to a crypto-loving preacher with a questionable CV: Yep, it's still very much 5G silly season

Pascal Monett Silver badge

"The frequency that they're using is just below the classification of a weapon"

Statements like that make me immediately think : citation, please ? What is the scientific founding of your statement ?

It's not because you can articulate correctly that I am automatically going to bow before your words. You still need to make sense, and your arguments still need to be justified.

It's like that stupid video about 9/11, showing one tower collapsing. The voice was saying that it was obvious that the debris was falling at the same speed as the tower, when the video was clearly showing that it fell faster.

If you're too stupid to realize that your eyes are telling you a different story than your ears, then you don't deserve to be part of the human race.

Sorry, but stupidity really gets me rankled.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020