Re: It's Micro$oft ...
<pedant>
No, the bottom step is second to the second step and the second step is second to the third step. It's only the top step that is second to none.
</pedant>
I may have missed your point ...
<pedant>
No, the bottom step is second to the second step and the second step is second to the third step. It's only the top step that is second to none.
</pedant>
I may have missed your point ...