Reply to post: Re: What??!!

Apple tries to have VirnetX VPN patent ruling overturned again, US Supremes say no... again

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: What??!!

Because their patent basically covers ANY point to point videoconferencing connection, as if that wasn't something completely obvious to do.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021