HPE Trying to Lose
So a beancounter has testified that if you make many assumptions about Autonomy's accounting practices you can 'prove' Autonomy was guilty. However, is there any evidence any of these assumptions are valid or just pulled out HPE's collective arse to 'prove' their case. Basically HPE seems to have admitted they really do not have a case and are at best wasting the court's time if not committing fraud themselves.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
