Reply to post: Re: Isn't THIS why we've got to teach 2nd-graders how to "code", rather than how to think?

You're not Boeing to believe this: Yet another show-stopping software bug found in ill-fated 737 Max airplanes

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Isn't THIS why we've got to teach 2nd-graders how to "code", rather than how to think?

Quote: ..."These technical reviews are expected to turn up glitches and gremlins.."

*

Hey...way back in the dark ages of software development, I was taught that "quality" in a sofware product started with a robust DESIGN....long before anyone started to write code. If the DESIGN could not survive a detailed review, then the DESIGN needed some help.

*

The article also comments that two computers, formerly working independently, are now "connected together".....and something about this process didn't quite work out. Harking back to a successful safety DESIGN, I seem to recall that the Space Shuttle had a multi-computer control system, where THREE OUT OF FIVE computers needed to AGREE, before a control decision was implemented. Oh...and the five computers involved in the voting were all CODED by independent teams to the same DESIGN.

*

Haven't Boeing learned anything about quality and safety?

*

But then a wise man once pointed out that another successful company (the family of the Bourbon kings) "had forgotten nothing....and learned nothing".

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon