Reply to post: Re: Google's arguments fail

Reusing software 'interfaces' is fine, Google tells Supreme Court, pleads: Think of the devs

ibmalone

Re: Google's arguments fail

Aside from the rest of your points being misunderstandings or simply back to front (API cloning was the established practice), I'm curious about this:

they still can claim ownership of the java community.

What do you think is the actual basis in law for "ownership of the java community"?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon