Reply to post: Re: exposed to rain, doesn't mean they aren't readable

Say GDP-aaaR: UK's Information Commissioner pours £275k fine into London pharmacy's teaspoon

Halfmad Silver badge

Re: exposed to rain, doesn't mean they aren't readable

On 100% of the paper?

It's something the El'Reg readers are totally inconsistent on. They may be experts on database tech, auditing etc but the basics - go right over their heads.

They didn't even list an estimate for the number of people, that means it was all binned prior to ICO investigation, or the ICO completely failed to push them on it. Either of these is bad for the data subjects.

I 100% guarantee the average punter off the street would have been able to get some identifiable information from that pile of papers, it's not as if it was submerged in a swirling swimming pool.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020