Reply to post: Re: good idea to design a passenger plane needing active computer assistance to stay airborne ?

Deadly 737 Max jets no longer a Boeing concern – for now: Production suspended after biz runs out of parking space

jtaylor

Re: good idea to design a passenger plane needing active computer assistance to stay airborne ?

It sounds like you want to avoid Full Authority Digital Engine Control.

On the 737 MAX*, computers control the engine operation. The pilots can start the engine, command thrust, or shutdown. They can see temperatures and shaft speeds, but have no direct control over individual parts. Imagine your car if they took away the manual choke and added electronic ignition.

MCAS isn't required to keep the aircraft in the air. If the pilots are trained on the 737 MAX**, they can fly without it. Hell, it's probably safer with MCAS disabled.

Active yaw damping is another situation where computers "actuate controls without input from the pilot." If that malfunctions, you just get seasick. You don't die. So we'll leave that.

Engines, though. It's hard to stay airborne without engines.

*possibly most other modern airplanes too

**extra training is exactly what airlines did not want

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020