I think the straw man is unemployed
I don't think so. I am suggesting that avoidance or relocation are possible direct consequences of the following statement in the same comment, viz. "Humans can, and should, constrain their activities so that they benefit humans."
The bigger picture is that businesses that employ staff play a useful role in the economy if not everyone turns out to be artisanal cake baker working from their kitchen, or an Instagram influencer.
Monopolies should be constrained, and lawbreaking punished (and whistleblowers protected), but you will not get the organisations with the scale to invest in supplying useful goods and services (at reasonable costs) or the returns that your pension funds need to sustain you in retirement without balancing the incentives needed to build such businesses with robust protection for suppliers, customers and employees. Or even the Inland Revenue (where Google really needs a swift kick).
I've commented here previously that businesses operate in markets (for goods, services and labour) that are in the gift of the public and the government that represents it, creating trust, efficiency and access. This justifies taxation of corporate profits, the application of VAT, as well as regulation of conduct (such as non-discrimination), safety and honest representation. Access to the labour market is a fair exchange for providing workers with particular skills or knowledge oppotunities to be rewarded and sustained without them necessarily needing to have all the skills to run a business themselves.