Reply to post: Re: No! Do Not Want!

WebAssembly gets nod from W3C and, most likely, an embrace from cryptojackers online

eldakka

Re: No! Do Not Want!

The caveat is that I do have some sympathy for those who want to minify JavaScript to lower their visitors' bandwidth usage.

If the app is so large that downloading it each time a user accesses the 'website' (I put website in quotes, because it seems like you aren't accessing a websiite, but a mechanism for downloading code to one's computer) uses significant bandwidth, many it should be made into this thing called a client application, that can be downloaded once and re-used many times?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon