Reply to post: Backwards compatible

We are absolutely, definitively, completely and utterly out of IPv4 addresses, warns RIPE

IGnatius T Foobar ! Bronze badge

Backwards compatible

The way to make IPv6 "backwards compatible" would have been to make addresses variable-length. Initially, all addresses would just happen to be 32 bits in length. But after everyone's converted over, then you start handing out addresses that are longer than 32 bits. In 20 years we'd have gotten there by now.

Variable length addresses would have been compatible with existing routing algorithms that look for the "most specific route" and would give *every* node the ability to split its own address into a network. For example, if your ISP assigns you, you could subnet it into,, etc. and then downstream you could do the same thing with,, etc. And when someone on the other side of the world sends a packet deep into your network, the most specific address on the public Internet is still, and it goes to your router.

Think that's silly? Keep in mind that SNMP OID's are assigned *exactly* this way. You get your *one* number, and you can put as many levels underneath it as you want.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020