Reply to post: Re: "not in the best interests of shareholders"

HP to Xerox: Nope, your $33.5bn bid falls short of our valuation

Monday 18th November 2019 16:28 GMT Charlie Clark

Re: "not in the best interests of shareholders"

Odd is that companies themselves can't indugle the same kind of cross-ownership that investors can. I assume that nobody ever expected this to be a problem.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

Email

Your email address is never published

Password

Forgotten password ?

Remember me on this computer? Post anonymously?

• Enter your comment

• Add an icon

Title

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

None

• User topics

• Article topics

Most Read

1. 

   And just like that, Amazon Web Services forked Elasticsearch, Kibana. Was that part of the plan, Elastic?

2. 

   Must 'completely free' mean 'hard to install'? Newbie gripe sparks some soul-searching among Debian community

3. 

   Microsoft Edge goes homomorphic: Nobody will see your credentials... but you'll need to sign in to use it

4. 

   You can drive a car with your feet, you can operate a sewing machine with your feet. Same goes for computers obviously

5. 

   Reg reader's XXXbox oddity: The BBC4 topless thumbnail trauma whodunnit