Reply to post: Re: ABC v Alphabet

High Court dismisses nameless Google Right To Be Forgotten sueball man... yes, again

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: ABC v Alphabet

I'd guess the reasoning is that Google don't technically need to know his identity unless and until a court decides that the content should be removed. So, if a court is willing/able to decide that all content which matches certain tests should be taken down based on private communication, there would be no need for claiming parties to risk Streisanding themselves in public court.

There is already some precedent for this, as Google voluntarily doesn't require people to go to court to get "revenge porn" de-listed, for example.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021