Re: Where in "keep and bear arms" does it say anything about them not being attached to an aircraft?
Not quite, because if you were not allowed to store it, that would prevent you from "bearing" it when you wanted to.
All part of the joys of law I guess. So UK law allowed me to 'bear' arms but mostly between home & authorised range, with security requirements for transportation in between. Which was occasionally frustrating, ie I had access to land where I could shoot a .308, but not a 9mm. Which I guess comes down to how much you trust your citizens to behave responsibility. Sticking a shotgun on a drone and plinking stuff on private land would be a lot less dangerous than operating one in downtown Detroit or Chicago.. But I guess it's easier to draft simple laws outlawing activities than attempting to carve out lawful exemptions.
Which to me kinda sums up a lot of the 2nd Amendment debate.. Especially in a YouTube world where people may think more about the potential views/likes than their (or other people's) safety. Which in a Darwinian sense might be ok, would still result in a lot of paperwork for people investigating why trying to use an encyclopedia as body armour was a really bad idea. If nothing else, that diverts resources away from finding and stopping people who don't care about the legalities, but see the potential of making their own armed drones.