Step 1
I think Rabinowitz's strategy is to try to establish that Lynch did read - and so know - things he has said earlier he did not know.
(Rabinowitz hopes to prove that Lynch knew Autonomy was fraudulently bulking out its revenues to make itself look like a tempting takeover target.)
Step 2
Building on that he can then say that he has had a controlling hand and influence over other things
(Rabinowitz hopes to prove that Lynch influenced or controlled the bulking out of revenues at autonomy)
Step 3
Then he can claim that Lynch committed fraud
... Looks like he is stuck on step 1