Reply to post:

There's a reason why my cat doesn't need two-factor authentication

Kubla Cant

Security always seems to exemplify an invalid syllogism: secure systems are inconvenient, therefore inconvenient systems are secure.

It follows that a keypad at an inconvenient height is more secure than a normal one. When it starts to rain, it becomes even more secure. Presumably somebody thinks that criminals are deterred by minor inconveniences - "I was going to rob the bank, but the queues were too long, so I couldn't be bothered."

If you draw attention to the difficulties of using most systems, you will get a sympathetic hearing. If you do the same with a security system, you're treated like the sort of feckless moron who leaves a key under the mat.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon