Reply to post: 10-client IO-500 numbers are apples vs. oranges

After this, there is no turning back: Funds flood in for Matrix-maker WekaIO

Guy Smiley
Thumb Down

10-client IO-500 numbers are apples vs. oranges

It isn't clear why you continue to tout the IO-500 10-client storage results. Weka used NVMe PCI storage, Summit used NLSAS HDDs. Half of the IO bandwidth of the result is based on IOPS, so there is no question that NVMe is going to beat HDDs on this workload. How is the scalability of Weka vs. GPFS or Lustre? There are no results on the IO-500 with more than 17 clients.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022