Reply to post:

Koh-MG: Qualcomm guilty of abusing chip patent monopoly, biz promises to appeal

Mark 85

So Qualcomm not only charged for the chips, but also a separate and seemingly high license fee? I can't think of any other industry that does this as usually any license fees end up in the cost the product with the more product you buy, the lower the license fee per unit. Seems like a double whammy to me.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon