Seriously?
"Dissenting from Lord Carnwath were Lords Sumption and Wilson, who said section 67(8) was clear and that Parliament had obviously intended to ensure the IPT could not be judicially reviewed or otherwise appealed against."
It doesn't matter if that's what was intended if its against the law and outside due process - that's literally the argument of PI and what the majority agreed with. Its a literal non-argument.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
