"Egan remains on the witness stand this afternoon for cross-examination by Hussain's barrister, Paul Casey. "
And will round two be the same as round one? In one fell swoop could HP's case fall over when one of the actual criminals admits they made up claims that others were aware of their dealings?
Still, if it's good enough for the US government, surely Egan's word will be good enough? Or does he have to wait for the HP lawyers tell him what to say before he answers that?
So much popcorn...
Biting the hand that feeds IT
