IBM has demanded the name of the person who leaked an internal document that appeared to show the company was deliberately targeting and firing older workers.
Obviously so they can sack the person.
Not only does IBM want to know who provided the document but it wants Langley to pay its legal costs for the discovery effort, as sanctions for refusing to cooperate during a prior deposition.
So they can drain him of much money as possible so he can't continue the case.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
