Reply to post: Re: Patching nonsense

And here's Intel's Epyc response: Up-to 56-core, 4GHz 14nm second-gen Xeon SP chips, Agilex FPGAs, persistent mem

Roo
Windows

Re: Patching nonsense

I suspect the killer for Intel is the cost of the validation. It can't be cheap (or quick) to validate changes to access validation and speculative execution with a huge ISA like x86.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021