Reply to post: Re: AI

Googlers, eggheads urge web giant's bosses to kick top conservative off its AI ethics council

BigSLitleP

Re: AI

I'm sorry but my belief is that most of what you said is pointless drivel.

Your whole premise is based on the fact that you can't disprove a negative. As a wise man once pointed out "Throughout history, every mystery ever solved has turned out to be NOT MAGIC." As another one pointed out, religion is being dwindled to the point of being known as "the god of the gaps".

As evidence piles up more and more on the side of plate that is no god, it does become less and less rational to try to force people (and religious people are required to force people) to follow any given deity. Gravity hasn't been proven but i'm fairly sure that anyone stating it doesn't exist would be classed as irrational.

Although you can consider and evaluate an idea without agreeing with it, you're ability to consider and evaluate it fairly drop away dramatically.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon