Reply to post: I'm confused again.

Autonomy trial: Key HPE witness might not testify, UK High Court told

The Nazz Silver badge

I'm confused again.

From early in the article ...

1) HPE want to call Egan as a witness.

2) Lynch opposes this.

3) Yet Lynch's own lawyers "wanted to put it to Egan in person that his witness statement "is, in large part, false".

So why oppose him as a live witness, the best opportunity to achieve 3) is to have him appear as a witness, on oath, in the dock.

( aside from the issue of Egan not wanting to attend nor ability to make him do so).

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021