Is no one seeing the contradictions in these positions?
Companies are accused of a) hiring more men, who cost more than women (allegedly), because they are sexist and give preferential treatment to said mem and b) fire older men because they are more expensive to maintain than younger ones.
Surely, if both of these things are true then what we'd see is companies hiring younger women by preference because they are cheaper.
I don't get it. Surely they can't both be true?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
