Reply to post: Re: Isn't it bad?

YouTube fight gets dirty: Kids urged to pester parents over Article 13

LucreLout

Re: Isn't it bad?

No that isn't sufficient, they will need humans to watch each video before it can be put on Youtube.

I must have missed that part of Article 13. Please can you provide a citation?

If a law is impossible to follow then it is a bad law, what if we made a law that required drug companies to cure cancer in the next 12 months and then prosecuted them when they failed to do so, would you still say 'well they should have followed the law'.

You're assuming they'd fail at the challenge. There's simply no way of knowing for sure what would happen if the entire industry was forced into a farm bet on a single outcome - certainly more progress would be made more quickly than in any other scenario.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon