My biggest problem with Kieran's article, is that it definitely needs the Touch of an Editor, because there are three sections with Purpose Creep.
"Cleverly" written, attributable to "condensing", but ultimately Really Bad Language.
Given the report, there will be an army of BOFH's ripping out MB's and minutely inspecting them, so we'll know soon enough. But K. is guilty of "tendentious reporting" , to use the polite European term.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
