Reply to post: Potentially not THAT bad

A third of London boroughs 'fess to running unsupported server software

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Potentially not THAT bad

If they're running in isolation, locked down, maybe just for compatibility with an old application then that seems pretty reasonable.

I had to repair a system running Windows 98 a few months ago. An embedded system that's been running every day for 20 years (rebooted daily, mind- it's still Win98) and shows no sign of failing, except for the date/time backup battery being too old to work (it was a soldered-on model, it's been out of service for about 10 years but they decided to renew it). I've no significant worries about that system outlasting the rest of the system it's a part of.

Why upgrade if it's not broken and there's no benefit?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon