Reply to post: Re: "decried as 'fake news' because it's written by well known climate 'deniers'"

It's 2018 so, of course, climate.news is sold to climate change deniers

Voland's right hand Silver badge

Re: "decried as 'fake news' because it's written by well known climate 'deniers'"

Maybe the authors ruined their reputation previously, but in the cited work they seem to just summarize reviewed scientific results.

Please read the whole abstract. It is quite clear towards the end that the claim in the article is that the predicted temperature data for sea temperature (a very common input variable into most global warming models) differs from observed. Not surprising. If it differed significantly, the hurricane patterns should have changed significantly and they have not. While we have had a few odd years, there is not enough changes to demonstrate something statistically significant.

As with every research on a very hot topic (remember the fake clonings?) there is some good research and some bottom feeders related to meteorological science. That's now valid for both sides as the amount of money thrown at "no global warming" by the likes of Cox brothers has become roughly comparable to what scientists get as financing for global warming research with a confirmation bias.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon