Re: Gorsuch's dissent FTW.
The question is, would "burning third party to the ground and pissing on the ashes" result in a different decision in this case? It's a yes/no question.
If no, then the question remains "why vote against the majority?'
If yes, then the question becomes "how do Gorsuch's high-minded opinions actually represent a net improvement to the private citizen?"
Biting the hand that feeds IT
