Re: ER, no, the court will be quite clear
"The Pai order was based on zero evidence, and no public support. Nothing had changed since 2015. Thus the change was 'arbitrary and capricious', and as such, is not a valid change. "
2015 was the aberration. Many people wanted net neutrality not the whole of Title II (with huge chunks of "forebearance" like price control). We're back to where the internet was 1993-2015.
You need to follow your opponents arguments more closely if you are going to rebut them effectively.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
