Reply to post:

You love Systemd – you just don't know it yet, wink Red Hat bods

Tomato42

> Why would I feel the need to write a replacement for something which has been working for me without major problems for two decades?

funny you say that, because for other people old sysV init wasn't working and systemD is a welcome replacement as it does work, and does work exactly as advertised

yes, including starting services only after the network is available

(use "After=syslog.target network.target")

> there are already several working alternatives apart from systemd

and yet for some reason Debian, SLES, Fedora, Archlinux, CoreOS and Mageia use it by default, it's almost as if people that had to deal with SysV issues knew about those issues and wanted them gone

but conspiracy theories are much more exciting

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon