Re: Conclusion is wrong
and how it would have most likely classified even anti-racism and anti-sexism materials (which we, as humanity, have generated in large amounts in the last 50-60 years or so) as sexist or racist
A very valid point, especially given how many times in recent history that exact scenario has happened. Seriously, any academic resource on a certain political party from late 1930s-early 1940s Germany would almost certainly get labeled as hate speech by an AI. And then you get things - like basically anything talking about female sexism towards men - that inappropriately get labeled as hate speech even by some humans. How in the world could you possibly expect the limited AI we have today to tell the difference?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
