Reply to post: Re: Sex = bad - Violence = good

US Senate green-lights controversial anti-sex-trafficking law amid warnings of power grab

P. Lee

Re: Sex = bad - Violence = good

I detect a facetious tone. In the context of sex trafficking, what you are actually opposing is:

Rape = Bad, Giving Women the Ability to Neutralize Men's Physical Strength Advantage = Good

Are you sure you meant to do that?

As far as the advertising goes, I'm all for making things safer, though I am concerned if "making it safer" also raises demand, which increases trafficking. If safer = more trafficking, then I question the assertion of "safer."

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon