Re: False positive paradox
Ah yes, common sense, that famously infallible method of answering difficult statistics questions.
There have been numerous wrongful convictions in the past based on judges, juries and even experts failing to understand the statistical power of particular pieces of evidence.
Oh and yes, you're right. Saying this:
Proclaiming loudly that "the new tech will lead to people being wrongfully executed on the say of some computer" is willfully misunderstanding how it will be implemeted.
...is indeed a strawman argument, given that I did not say what you quoted. Credit for calling out your own logical fallacy.