An offer:
@sisk,
I'll make a binding offer right here:
If you'll advocate for sane adjudication of mental health accusations, I'll advocate for tight restrictions on people who are fairly judged to be a danger.
I'm a former organizer with ties to both major parties (and even some Green and Libertarian contacts), so that's not a casual offer.
Some of it is just common sense; a probable cause requirement wouldn't interfere with reasonable detentions (since someone making threats could still be held on the spot, and someone more insidiously dangerous can't be charged or committed anyway), and it would have the side effect of saving taxpayers and ratepayers a lot of money.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
